I thought I might toss in my first thoughts to the sacrificial burning-through of William Gibson’s Neuromancer to the gods of the Science Fiction book club.
The club has discussed the tendency in the science fiction novels we’ve read already to be written with a fluid, anglo-American machismo. Certainly in John Wyndham’s Day of the Triffids, the perspective of the first-person narrator is composed with unripple-able emotional cool – despite the endless life-threatening proliferation of man-eating plants. In The Island of Dr. Moreau the first-person narrator is still mainly emotionally inaccessible, but has human responses to the horrors that surround him. He still maintains a level-headed, factual account of his traumatizing experience on the island. None of that feminized hysteria for him.
But gosh and golly, William Gibson created the Marlboro man of the future. For Case – the protagonist – money, women, body-health, personal-relations all come second to his fervent desire to hustle in cyberspace. The narrative tone is all bravado, quick-paced, jargon-heavy. You imagine a wily man behind a drooping cigarette, feet propped up on a beat-up desk, idly playing with a revolver as he tells you the story.
The story is essentially a compilation of wet-dreams collected from nerdy computer-bound boys or girls interested in lithe, dangerous women, technology and big guns.
You can’t blame the man for being emotionally calloused, spending his life as a street-savvy hustler. But, can you blame the narrator for the heady mix of future-street-lingo, the introduction of what seems to be an endless stream of peripheral characters, and the bloated egoistic tone?
Well, why bother, I guess. There is a measure of seduction that popular authors try to employ with tone. Gibson’s narrator has a bullying tone, a continually challenging machismo, riddled with mysterious terms – leaving you feeling diminuitive in the shadow of the prose. Just as the endlessly persuasive Robinson Crusoe (what I see as an essential piece of proto-Anglo-American popular fiction) assumes a tone of unquestionable authority, of indisputed superiority through the voice of the narrator.
And, we the readers – culturally primed by centuries of literature read to us by aggressive narrators which assume a perfect voice of reason, not desiring questioning or participation, enjoy having a bloated ego pushing us along through a narrative.
It is all the forbidden machismo, the runamok cow-boy attitude that we crave, dovetailing with our desire to be pummelled with new technology.
It’s very good entertainment.